Retaliation is the most frequently alleged federal employment law violation — outnumbering discrimination claims in EEOC filings. Florida employers who take adverse action against employees after they exercise protected rights (filing an EEOC charge, complaining about harassment, filing a workers comp claim, taking FMLA leave) face retaliation claims that can be easier to prove than the underlying discrimination claim. Understanding retaliation law — what it covers, when it applies, and how to avoid triggering it — is essential for every Florida employer.
Employees are protected from retaliation for: (1) Filing EEOC charges or internal discrimination/harassment complaints; (2) Participating in an EEOC investigation (including as a witness); (3) Requesting reasonable accommodation under ADA or FMLA; (4) Filing a workers comp claim in Florida (§440.205 expressly prohibits retaliation); (5) Reporting safety violations to OSHA; (6) Filing a wage complaint with DOL or the Florida DEO; (7) Whistleblowing — reporting employer violations of law (Florida Whistleblower Act §448.102); (8) Jury duty; (9) Military service (USERRA). The breadth of protected activity is expansive — almost any complaint about illegal conduct is potentially protected.
Shopping group health for your team
Retaliation includes any 'materially adverse action' — something that would deter a reasonable employee from engaging in protected activity. This extends beyond termination: demotion, pay reduction, schedule changes, reassignment to less desirable duties, negative performance reviews, increased scrutiny, exclusion from meetings, and hostile treatment by supervisors can all constitute retaliation. The Supreme Court's Burlington Northern standard (2006) means retaliation doesn't require tangible economic harm — actions that materially change the conditions of employment, even without pay loss, count.
Courts and juries view close timing between protected activity and adverse action as suspicious — suggesting a causal connection. An employee who files a harassment complaint and is terminated 2 weeks later has a very strong retaliation case on timing alone. Florida employers who need to take legitimate adverse action (terminate, demote, discipline) shortly after protected activity must have extraordinarily clear, pre-existing documentation supporting the legitimate business reason — and must demonstrate that the same action would have been taken without the protected activity. This is the 'but for' causation standard — would the adverse action have occurred even without the protected activity?
Florida Statutes §440.205 makes it illegal to discharge, threaten, or otherwise retaliate against an employee for filing or intending to file a workers comp claim. This is a strict prohibition — the employer doesn't need to have animus; the connection between the claim and the adverse action is enough. Florida courts have held that even an employer who doesn't know the employee intends to file a claim can be liable if the claim is filed shortly after the termination decision. Workers comp retaliation claims: employee must show termination occurred 'because of' the claim. Statute of limitations: 2 years from the retaliatory act.
Best practices: (1) Document all performance issues, disciplinary actions, and attendance problems contemporaneously — before any protected activity occurs; (2) Separate the decision-makers — if possible, have the adverse action decision made by someone uninvolved in the protected activity (complaint, FMLA request, workers comp claim); (3) Never express frustration or negative comments about an employee's protected activity (even in casual conversation); (4) Ensure adverse action decisions follow pre-existing, consistently applied policy; (5) When in doubt, delay marginal adverse action decisions for 60+ days after protected activity to reduce temporal proximity suspicion; (6) Consult employment counsel before any adverse action affecting an employee who has recently engaged in protected activity.
We help Florida small business employers document employment decisions and avoid the retaliation claim patterns that generate six-figure judgments.
Get a Free Consultation